Semaglutide Reduces Cardiovascular Risks in Obese Patients without Diabetes: Insights from the SELECT Trial

More than half of the world's population is projected to be overweight or obese by 2035. This staggering statistic underscores the urgent need to address the health challenges associated with excess weight, particularly the increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Obesity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular events, even when considering other metabolic factors like cholesterol and blood pressure. While treatments for conditions like high cholesterol, high blood pressure, and diabetes are well-established, effectively addressing obesity to lower cardiovascular risks has been challenging due to limited evidence supporting lifestyle changes or medications. The SELECT trial aimed to determine if semaglutide, a medication already used for type 2 diabetes and weight loss, could effectively reduce cardiovascular risk in individuals who are overweight or obese but do not have diabetes.

Understanding Semaglutide

Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. GLP-1 receptor agonists are a class of medications originally used to manage type 2 diabetes. They work by mimicking the effects of GLP-1, a naturally occurring hormone that stimulates insulin release and reduces glucagon secretion from the pancreas [no source information]. This action helps regulate blood sugar levels.

Beyond their role in blood sugar control, GLP-1 receptor agonists are also used to treat overweight and obesity. This expanded use is based on their ability to induce weight loss. Semaglutide, in particular, has demonstrated an ability to impact a "broad range of metabolic pathways associated with glucose metabolism, energy homeostasis, and inflammation," suggesting that it might improve cardiovascular outcomes even in those without diabetes.

For example, in a previous study, a weekly subcutaneous dose of 2.4 mg of semaglutide for 104 weeks resulted in an average body weight reduction of 15.2% in individuals with overweight or obesity who did not have diabetes. The SELECT trial builds upon these findings by investigating if this weight loss, along with other potential benefits of semaglutide, can translate into a reduction in cardiovascular risk.

Examining Semaglutide's Impact: The SELECT Trial Design

The SELECT Trial, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, event-driven superiority trial, was conducted across 804 clinical sites in 41 countries. The trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of semaglutide in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in overweight or obese individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, who did not have diabetes.

Here's a breakdown of the key elements of the trial design:

Patient Population: The trial included patients aged 45 years or older, with a BMI of 27 or greater (overweight or obese) and established cardiovascular disease.

  • Cardiovascular disease was defined as a history of myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease.
  • Individuals with a prior diabetes diagnosis, a glycated hemoglobin level of 6.5% or higher, those receiving glucose-lowering medication or GLP-1 receptor agonists within the past 90 days, and those with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure, end-stage kidney disease, or dialysis were excluded.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either once-weekly subcutaneous injections of semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg or a placebo.

  • The semaglutide dosage was gradually increased over 16 weeks, starting from 0.24 mg and titrating up every 4 weeks (to 0.5, 1.0, 1.7, and finally 2.4 mg).

Primary Endpoint: The trial's primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, evaluated in a time-to-first-event analysis.

Duration and Follow-up: The event-driven nature of the trial meant that it continued until a predetermined number of primary endpoint events (1225) occurred. The researchers initially estimated a trial duration of 59 months, anticipating a 2.2% annual event rate for the primary endpoint in the placebo group. The average follow-up period for patients was 39.8 months, with an average duration of exposure to semaglutide or placebo of 34.2 months.

The SELECT trial's robust design aimed to definitively assess whether semaglutide, beyond its weight-loss effects, provides a cardiovascular benefit in a high-risk population.

Promising Results: What the SELECT Trial Found

The SELECT trial yielded encouraging results, demonstrating that semaglutide could be a valuable tool in cardiovascular disease management for overweight or obese individuals. Here's a closer look at the key findings:

Significant Reduction in Cardiovascular Events: The trial's primary endpoint analysis revealed a statistically significant 20% reduction in the risk of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) in the semaglutide group compared to the placebo group. This translates to a hazard ratio of 0.80, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.72 to 0.90, underscoring the robustness of the observed effect. It's noteworthy that these effects manifested relatively early in the trial and remained consistent across various cardiovascular endpoints and patient subgroups.

Notable Weight Loss: Consistent with previous research, semaglutide demonstrated substantial weight loss benefits. Over the 104-week study period, patients receiving semaglutide achieved an average weight reduction of 9.39% from their baseline weight. In contrast, the placebo group experienced a minimal average weight loss of 0.88%. This difference of 8.51 percentage points further highlights the efficacy of semaglutide in promoting weight loss.

Improvements in Other Cardiovascular Risk Markers: Beyond the primary endpoint, semaglutide's benefits extended to other essential indicators of cardiovascular health. Patients in the semaglutide group showed:

  • A reduction in waist circumference.
  • Improved glycemic control, even though the study excluded individuals with diabetes.
  • Lower blood pressure, with a notable average decrease of 3.3 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure.
  • Favorable changes in lipid profiles, including decreased triglyceride levels and increases in HDL (good) cholesterol.
  • Reduced levels of C-reactive protein, a marker of inflammation.

These multifaceted effects of semaglutide, encompassing weight loss and improvements in several cardiovascular risk factors, underscore its potential as a comprehensive treatment strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention in individuals with overweight or obesity. The trial findings suggest that the observed cardiovascular benefits may stem from a combination of weight loss and other direct physiological effects of semaglutide.

Addressing Side Effects and Study Limitations

While the SELECT trial highlighted the potential of semaglutide for cardiovascular risk reduction, it's important to consider the observed side effects and the study's limitations.

Side Effects

  • Gastrointestinal Issues: The trial revealed that semaglutide was generally well-tolerated; however, gastrointestinal side effects were more frequent in the semaglutide group compared to the placebo group. Specifically, a higher percentage of patients in the semaglutide group permanently discontinued treatment due to adverse events, most commonly gastrointestinal disorders. These events primarily included nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, which are known side effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists, particularly during the initial dosage escalation phase.
  • Gallbladder Concerns: The trial also observed a higher incidence of gallbladder-related disorders in the semaglutide group compared to the placebo group. This association between semaglutide and gallbladder issues has been reported in previous studies as well.
  • Other Serious Events: Importantly, the trial did not find a higher frequency of other serious adverse events, such as acute kidney failure, pancreatitis, cancers, or psychiatric disorders, in the semaglutide group compared to the placebo group.
  • Limitations
  • Focus on Secondary Prevention: The SELECT trial exclusively enrolled individuals with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Consequently, the study's findings cannot be directly extrapolated to determine semaglutide's efficacy in primary prevention—that is, preventing cardiovascular events in individuals without established cardiovascular disease.
  • Limited Generalizability: The trial's participant demographics may limit the generalizability of the findings. The study population predominantly consisted of men (72.3%), with a notably lower representation of women (27.7%). Additionally, only 3.8% of participants identified as Black, potentially limiting the applicability of the findings to this demographic group.
  • Understanding both the potential benefits and the possible drawbacks, as well as acknowledging the limitations of the SELECT trial, is crucial for healthcare professionals and patients when considering semaglutide as part of a comprehensive cardiovascular disease management strategy.

Implications for Clinical Practice and Future Directions

The findings from the SELECT trial have significant implications for the way healthcare professionals approach cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment, especially in the context of the escalating global obesity epidemic.

Expanding the Scope of Semaglutide Use: The trial's demonstration of semaglutide's efficacy in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events in individuals with overweight or obesity but without diabetes has the potential to change clinical practice. Current guidelines already recommend GLP-1 receptor agonists, including semaglutide, for cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes. The SELECT trial strengthens the case for considering semaglutide more broadly for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events in individuals who have overweight or obesity and established atherosclerotic vascular disease, even if they do not have diabetes.

Addressing Prediabetes with Renewed Focus: The SELECT trial enrolled a substantial number of participants with prediabetes (glycated hemoglobin levels of 5.7% to 6.4%). The findings highlight the need for a more proactive approach to prediabetes management. Early intervention with strategies like semaglutide, particularly in those with existing cardiovascular disease, might slow or prevent the progression to type 2 diabetes and reduce associated cardiovascular risks.

The Need for Primary Prevention Studies: A crucial next step is to investigate the effectiveness of semaglutide in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. This would involve conducting large-scale trials with individuals who have overweight or obesity but no history of cardiovascular disease. Such studies would provide definitive evidence for or against recommending semaglutide to a broader population for cardiovascular disease prevention.

Importance of Patient-Centered Care: The decision to use semaglutide should be made through careful consultation between healthcare professionals and patients. Factors like individual patient preferences, potential benefits, risks and side effects (especially gastrointestinal issues), and cost considerations should all be part of the discussion. The availability of effective strategies to manage potential side effects, like gastrointestinal symptoms, will be essential to optimize adherence and treatment success.

The SELECT trial represents a significant advancement in cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment in the face of the global obesity epidemic. The findings pave the way for a more proactive and comprehensive approach to managing cardiovascular risk in overweight or obese individuals. However, further research, particularly in primary prevention and diverse populations, is needed to fully realize the potential of semaglutide and to develop personalized treatment strategies for optimal cardiovascular health.

Disclaimer: This blog post is intended for educational purposes only and should not be taken as medical advice. Always consult your healthcare provider for personal health concerns.